Tailte Éireann

• We understand that ownership of form 3 certificates, based on established case law is that of the solicitor’s client, and that form 3 certificates. Once they’re filed with Tailte Éireann for the purpose of underwriting of title still remain the property of the solicitor’s client for whom they were filed, as the solicitor only carries insurance for his clients, that being the client who he did the conveyancing for and who he filed the form certificate for. Based on this, these certificates are owned by the client on behalf of the solicitor who is client. Can you confirm this to be the case? • Given the above number 1, does the solicitor have the right to revoke a form 3 certificate that he filed with Tailte Éireann (The Property Registration Authority) due to an instruction from his client or his insurance company, as a result of this as a result of discomfort, recognition of a mistake, fraud or error, so that he can amend and cure the problem. Therefore, he must have the ability to revoke said certificate. Is there a law against the procedure of revocation in place? • What is the impact on a form three certificate issued to establish folios should the solicitor be forced, due to the above- mentioned items to revoke his certificate that has already been issued? Based on a now revoked form 3 certificate, what are the implications for the instrument supporting a Folio capital? Additionally, what cautions if any, are advised to be placed on the Folio in question to mitigate any detrimental effects until the certificate is duly cured, audited or reinsured? • Does the Law Society given solicitors are, as described by the Property Registration Authority relied upon because they are “officers of the court” does the Law Society provide any form of insurance to Tailte Éireann, and/or The Property Registration Authority with regard to form 3 certificates filed in the process of first registration of title by solicitors.