public body

Tailte Éireann

FOI Requests — 76 records (page 2 of 2)

  • Received
    Decided 31 July 2023
    Granted
    Request Reference FOI 16/2023
    Requester Type Other
    Tailte Éireann

    • Report CE8/2022 discussed under agenda item 3 on the Authority meeting held on 10 March 2022 • Report CE12/2022 discussed under agenda item 3 on the Authority meeting held on 14 April 2022 • Report CE18/2022 discussed under agenda item 3 on the Authority meeting held on 9 June 2022

  • Received
    Decided 31 July 2023
    Part-Granted
    Request Reference FOI 17/2023
    Requester Type Other
    Tailte Éireann

    • Copy of the Audit Report on the Review of the PRA SIC including Financial Control 2021 considered by the Audit and Risk Committee at its meeting on 23 March 2021 • Compliance Assurance Report considered by the Audit and Risk Committee at its meeting on 23 March 2022 under agenda item 2. • managed services for your ITSM platform? • If this is managed internally, please confirm the same. • How many user licences do you have for your ITSM platform? • Who is the principal contact for IT Services within your organisation? i.e. Director of IT or Head of

  • Received
    Decided 31 July 2023
    Granted
    Request Reference FOI 18/2023
    Requester Type Other
    Tailte Éireann

    • 2022 Oversight Agreement between the PRA and Housing, Local Government and Heritage

  • Received
    Decided 14 July 2023
    Part-Granted
    Request Reference FOI 19/2023
    Requester Type Other
    Tailte Éireann

    • Minutes and records of a meeting held on 3rd April 2023 between Tailte and the HSE regarding Safe Access Zones

  • Received
    Decided 26 May 2023
    Part-Granted
    Request Reference FOI 09/2023
    Requester Type Other
    Tailte Éireann

    • Gach leagan den Phlean Gníomhaithe

  • Received
    Decided 21 March 2023
    Deemed Refused
    Request Reference FOI 01/2023
    Requester Type Other
    Tailte Éireann

    • the valuation of any data centre entered in the valuation list for the rating authority area of Dublin City Council (the “Rating Authority Area”), which was published on 31 December 2013 (the “2013 Revaluation”) • any discussions, proposals or decisions made in relation to the valuation of data centres in the Rating Authority Area since the 2013 Revaluation; • the proposed revision of any data centre since within the Rating Authority Area since the 2013 Revaluation, including without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing, the request for revision, the basis for the proposal and the proposed valuation; • the revision of any data centres within the Rating Authority Area since the 2013 Revision, including without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing, any representations made to the Revision Manager and the consideration of those representations; • any and all policy documents, guidelines, internal or external communications relating to the valuation of data centres generally.

  • Received
    Decided 21 March 2023
    Granted
    Request Reference FOI 08/2023
    Requester Type Other
    Tailte Éireann

    • Copy of the National Mapping Agreement • List of current signatories to the National Mapping Agreement

  • Received
    Decided
    Request Reference
    Requester Type
    Tailte Éireann

    • Sonraí iomlán de gach Phleann a bhí agat ó dul-i-bhfeidhm an Achta • Dáta ar a foilsíodh gach Plean Dáta ar a chuaigh gach Plean i bhfeidhm • An méid airgead, miondhealaithe de réir cúiseanna na gcoastas, a caitheadh ar chruthú agus ar chur i bhfeidhm gach Plean

  • Received
    Decided
    Request Reference
    Requester Type
    Tailte Éireann

    Service Delivery. Please provide LinkedIn or available contact details (where appropriate).

  • Received
    Decided
    Request Reference
    Requester Type
    Tailte Éireann

    • How many user licences do you have for your ITSM platform? • Who is the principal contact for IT Services within your organisation? i.e. Director of IT or Head of Service Delivery. Please provide LinkedIn or available contact details (where appropriate).

  • Received
    Decided
    Request Reference
    Requester Type
    Tailte Éireann

    Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS), Virus Monitoring Tools). • Does your organisation have plans to procure any of the below services, if yes then please provide information in the below format? Cloud computing, Software as a Service (SaaS), Platform as a Service (PaaS), Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS), anything as a Service (Xaas). • Does your organisation have any plans to procure the below services, if yes then please provide required information in the below format? Network Security, Cloud Security, Endpoint Security, Mobile Security, IoT Security, Application Security. • Does your organisation have any plans to procure below services, if yes then please provide information in the below format? Data and Analytics, AI and Automation, Digital Transformation.

  • Received
    Decided
    Request Reference
    Requester Type
    Tailte Éireann

    • Why such policies must note the interest of the PRA, is that to protect the PRA and the state guarantee.

  • Received
    Decided
    Request Reference
    Requester Type
    Tailte Éireann

    • Given the above number 1, does the solicitor have the right to revoke a form 3 certificate that he filed with Tailte Éireann (The Property Registration Authority) due to an instruction from his client or his insurance company, as a result of this as a result of discomfort, recognition of a mistake, fraud or error, so that he can amend and cure the problem. Therefore, he must have the ability to revoke said certificate. Is there a law against the procedure of revocation in place? • What is the impact on a form three certificate issued to establish folios should the solicitor be forced, due to the above- mentioned items to revoke his certificate that has already been issued? Based on a now revoked form 3 certificate, what are the implications for the instrument supporting a Folio capital? Additionally, what cautions if any, are advised to be placed on the Folio in question to mitigate any detrimental effects until the certificate is duly cured, audited or reinsured? • Does the Law Society given solicitors are, as described by the Property Registration Authority relied upon because they are “officers of the court” does the Law Society provide any form of insurance to Tailte Éireann, and/or The Property Registration Authority with regard to form 3 certificates filed in the process of first registration of title by solicitors.

  • Received
    Decided
    Request Reference
    Requester Type
    Tailte Éireann

    • Timelines associated with the procurement processes. • Any tender notices or requests for proposals related to ICT procurement, if available.

  • Received
    Decided
    Request Reference
    Requester Type
    Tailte Éireann

    register during the existence of a folio issued by the Irish state. • Does a folio issued by the Irish carry international conclusiveness of title as it does in the UK.

  • Received
    Decided
    Request Reference
    Requester Type
    Tailte Éireann

    • Any and all policy documents or guidelines relating to the valuation of wind farms generally.

  • Received
    Decided
    Request Reference
    Requester Type
    Tailte Éireann

    the transfer, sale or any transaction between any entity and more particularly a financial institution to a third party, the registration of ownership by way of charge, note or any recognition what so ever over a folio charged with an already existing instrument number under which the Property Registration Authority or The Land Registry so acted.

  • Received
    Decided
    Request Reference
    Requester Type
    Tailte Éireann

    (c) treated as abandoned or lapsed. o 4. Where held, the average or median processing time for: (a) applications completed without o query, (b) applications placed on query. o 5. Any internal statistical reports, spreadsheets, or performance dashboards used to monitor application outcomes, delays, or queries during this period.

  • Received
    Decided
    Request Reference
    Requester Type
    Tailte Éireann

    • Is it a requirement or best practice for the Property Registration Authority to be named on any such policy to protect the state guarantee? • If a solicitor is satisfied with the due diligence and integrity of Title Solve policy provides protection to all parties (including the Property Registration Authority) against claims arising from unavailable or missing title documentation, is it acceptable for the solicitor to rely on this policy as part of their review of title?

  • Received
    Decided
    Request Reference
    Requester Type
    Tailte Éireann

    • The total moneys paid to Zing Technology each year.

  • Received
    Decided
    Request Reference
    Requester Type
    Tailte Éireann

    Éireann on 18 October 2024 pertaining to property number 2202011 (the “Property”). • Any and all internal records, reports or memoranda (howsoever described) which explain or outline the calculation of the valuation of the amount specified in the Global Valuation Certificate (€21,289,000). • Any and all internal records, reports or memoranda (howsoever described) relating to the Provisional Valuation Certificate issued on 12 July 2024 in respect of the Property, particularly any such records that consider the representations/submissions made by Avison Young on behalf of EirGrid; • Any and all internal records, reports of memoranda (howsoever described) relating to the method of valuation to be adopted in the valuation of the Property; and • Any and all internal records, reports or memoranda (howsoever described) relating to the unit of valuation, and the extent of the of the Property, to be valued.”

  • Received
    Decided
    Request Reference
    Requester Type
    Tailte Éireann

    up to and including 2025. Top 10 categories of those complaints”

  • Received
    Decided
    Request Reference
    Requester Type
    Tailte Éireann

    • Any documentation explaining how instruments and burdens are recorded together — for example, how the system ensures consistency between the burden entry date and the instrument reference assigned to it. • For illustration, where a burden entry on the folio shows one year while the associated Instrument reference bears the following year, please include an explanation of how such differences can arise within the registration system. • I am seeking a factual and procedural description of the registration process.

  • Received
    Decided
    Request Reference
    Requester Type
    Tailte Éireann

    etc), in a general sense not dealing specific. (How many completed, how many were rejected, etc) • Breakdown of what type of applications were received (first registration, transfer of ownership, registration of a charge, etc) • How many applications were lodged through the E-Registration portal? • How many applications were lodged through Land Direct? • How many applications were lodged in paper format (Form 17)? • How many applications were lodged in other methods, not outlined above? • How many dealings from this year are currently still active? • Has the organisation done a review as to why any dealings from this year are currently still active?

  • Received
    Decided
    Request Reference
    Requester Type
    Tailte Éireann

    govern how staff process and record such applications. • (b) The instruction, rule, or system behaviour that determines which date (execution date or lodgement date) appears in the Date column of a Burden entry on a folio when these dates do not match. • (c) The rule, instruction, or system behaviour that explains how or why a burden entry may display a date from one year while the associated Instrument/Dealing number reflects a lodgement year from a later year.

  • Received
    Decided
    Request Reference
    Requester Type
    Tailte Éireann

    • 1. Details of the ICT budget and planned ICT projects or initiatives for the current financial year. • 2. Documentation outlining planned ICT procurements, including (but not limited to) hardware, software, ICT maintenance agreements, and related services.